Dueling Statues:
The Icons of Chisinau
and Tiraspol

At the entrance to the main park in Chisinau stands a bronze medieval prince who spent 47 years refusing to let the Ottoman Empire swallow his country. Two hours east by road, a Russian imperial general sits on horseback on a hill in Tiraspol, founder of the city that would become the capital of a state most of the world does not recognise. Two statues, two heroes, and two versions of history that have spent three decades simply declining to acknowledge each other.

This is the story of the statues of Ștefan cel Mare (Stephen the Great) who stands in bronze at the entrance to a park in the capital of Moldova; Chisinau, and of Generalissimo Alexander Suvorov, also in bronze, who rides a horse on a hill in Tiraspol, Transnistria.

Two statues, two heroes, two versions of history that don't so much clash as simply refuse to acknowledge one another.

Which, this being Moldova and Transnistria, is more or less characteristic of how the dance of ideologies and historical interpretations can be expected to go.

Stephen: The Prince Who Wouldn't Lose
Suvorov: The General Who Wouldn’t Lose
Two Men, One River


Stephen: The Prince Who Wouldn't Lose

Stephen the Great ruled the medieval principality of Moldavia from 1457 until his death in 1504, which alone is an achievement at a time and in a place where rulers had an unfortunate habit of not surviving in the big chair for long. He spent most of that reign doing something almost nobody else in the region managed: holding off the mighty Ottoman Empire; the preeminent regional military power at that time. In 1475 he took on a much larger Ottoman army apart at the Battle of Vaslui, achieving a victory so thorough that Pope Sixtus IV reportedly called him the "true defender of the Christian faith" and briefly considered him Christendom's best hope against the Turks. He lost battles too though, nobody goes 47 years undefeated, but he also built or restored dozens of fortresses and churches, several of which are UNESCO-listed today, and generally left Moldavia more intact than he found it. The Romanian Orthodox Church made it official in 1992 as they canonised him as ‘Stephen the Great and Holy’. Sainthood is a hard thing to argue with and he remains the greatest figure in Moldovan history to this day.

The statue itself has had a turbulent existence though. Sculpted by Alexandru Plămădeală and unveiled in 1928, it stood on the site of a demolished Russian imperial monument: a sign that, in this part of the world in particular, statues have a habit of replacing other statues as meaningful political statements. It was shipped out of the country just ahead of the Soviet occupation in 1940, its pedestal dynamited,  then briefly reinstalled during the Second World War, removed again by the retreating Romanians, and finally put back (by the Soviets, oddly enough) in 1945. It took until 1989, with the USSR visibly coming apart, for the statue to be returned to its original site and for its old inscriptions to be restored. Today it stands at the entrance to Stephen the Great Park, the heart of the city, where officials lay flowers on national holidays and where more or less every visiting head of state gets photographed. If Moldova has a single object that says "this is who we are", then this bronze prince is it.


Suvorov: The General Who Wouldn’t Lose

A mere couple of hours by road to the east, and about four and a half centuries later, Generalissimo Alexander Suvorov arrived to do some fortress-building of his own. Suvorov (1729–1800) is rightly considered in the pantheon of Russia’s greatest military commanders (alongside Kutuzov – victor over Napoleon, Nevsky – victor over the Teutonic Knights, and Zhukov – victor over the Nazis).  A man who fought his way through the Seven Years' War, the Russo-Turkish Wars, the suppression of Poland's Kościuszko Uprising, and a famously audacious campaign across the Alps, and who is said to have never lost a major battle in his career. 
In 1792, while organising Russia's newly acquired southern frontier along the Dniester River, he ordered the construction of a fortress on the river's left bank. That fortress grew into a town. That town is now the city of Tiraspol, capital of Transnistria/PMR, and Suvorov is, quite literally, its founder.

The statue commemorating him went up in 1979, sculpted by Vladimir and Valentin Artamonov and good enough to win a Soviet state art prize as one of the finest monuments anywhere in the USSR (tough competition that, given the wealth of statuary that the Soviet Union produced). It sits on high ground in Suvorov Square, Tiraspol's main plaza, and is an unmissable icon of the city. Any visitor will have plenty of photos of the evocative mounted statue and will probably climb onto the base to get in on the action too. Suvurov’s face has appeared on Transnistrian banknotes and postage stamps since the republic started issuing its own currency in the 1990s. In a territory that most of the world does not recognise as a country at all, Suvorov is about as close to an official national symbol as it gets.


Two Men, One River

However, these aren't simply two old statues of two old soldiers. They're the founding myths of two places that, on paper, are the same country and, in practice, absolutely are not.

Chișinău's Stephen is a medieval Orthodox prince who resisted an eastern empire and is now, somewhat ironically, the patron saint of a modern state trying to align itself westward. Moldova has been an EU candidate since 2022 and continues to push for accession, treating Stephen's five centuries of independence-minded diplomacy as a kind of legacy endorsement. Tiraspol's Suvorov is an 18th-century Russian imperial general, still celebrated and revered in a self-declared republic that uses Soviet-era symbols, keeps a garrison of Russian troops on its soil, and depends heavily on Moscow for its economy, its passports of convenience, and its sense of identity.

Stephen and Suvorov may, if they had met (somehow!), have bonded over their own struggles against the Ottoman Empire (one cautiously dealing with it at its height, another while it was on the way down), but these days one man points to Bucharest and Brussels, the other points to Moscow. Both are, in their own telling, simply honouring local history, and both are also unmistakably making a claim about which direction this stretch of the Dniester River valley belongs to.

None of this is ancient history quietly settling into folklore, either. Transnistria remains internationally unrecognised, a frozen conflict since a short but bloody war in 1992, and the region has grown considerably less frozen since 2022, as the war next door in Ukraine has put fresh pressure on the Dniester as a fault line. Chișinău and Tiraspol have spent three decades essentially agreeing to disagree about which century, and which empire, gets to define them. These two statues, and what they stand for,  just happen to make that disagreement visible from a very long way off.



Koryo Tours
Group Tours to Moldova (& Transnistria)

Share

Simon Cockerell

Simon has been Koryo’s General Manager since 2002. He has travelled to North Korea more than 175 times and has probably been to the country more than any other Westerner. He is a respected speaker on the country and appears regularly in international media. He is also a tour specialist in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and the Russian Far East where he has personally designed and led multiple tours over the years.

Back to blog

[email protected] | + 86 10 6416 7544
WhatsApp (message only): +44 7822 014058